Methodology Documentation

SHAM: Measuring What Buyers Actually Experience

Seattle Housing Affordability Model v6.0

February 2026|Barry Varshay|431 monthly observations
SHAM = (Monthly PITI ÷ Monthly Gross Income) × 100

PITI is the full monthly housing cost: principal, interest, property taxes, homeowners insurance, and private mortgage insurance where applicable. SHAM measures that payment as a percentage of gross household income — the most direct possible measure of what the housing market demands from the people trying to participate in it.

The Premise

After 35 years of sitting across the table from homebuyers, one observation holds without exception: buyers make purchasing decisions based on the monthly payment.

Not the home price. Not the interest rate. Not the loan amount. The payment.

A buyer doesn't say "I can afford a $750,000 house." They say "I can afford $4,200 a month." Everything else works backward from there. Income determines what payment a buyer can sustain. The interest rate determines how much they can borrow to achieve that payment. The loan amount, combined with their down payment, determines the price they can offer.

This is not a theory. It is what happens in every purchase transaction, in every market, every day. The Seattle Housing Affordability Model is built on this observable reality.

Why Payment Matters More Than Price

Home prices get all the headlines. But price without context is meaningless.

A $500,000 home at 3% interest with 20% down costs $2,244 per month in PITI.

The same $500,000 home at 7% interest costs $3,461 — a 54% increase in what the buyer actually experiences, with no change in the sticker price.

Conversely, a $400,000 home at 7% costs $2,838 in PITI. A buyer stretching to afford $500,000 at 3% would find $400,000 at 7% more expensive in real monthly terms, despite a $100,000 lower price.

This is why price-to-income ratios — the standard affordability metric used by most analysts — miss the point. They capture the numerator (price) but ignore the financing conditions that determine what the buyer actually pays. SHAM captures the payment the buyer actually writes every month, because that is the number that determines whether homeownership is sustainable.

How SHAM Works

For any given month from January 1990 to the present, SHAM answers one question: what percentage of gross income would a median-income household spend on housing if they bought a median-priced home at that month's prevailing rates and down payment norms?

The Inputs

Home Price

Derived from the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index (SEXRNSA for Seattle), anchored at $229,950 when the index equaled 100 in January 2000. This is the index the Federal Reserve, academic researchers, and institutional analysts use. It tracks the same properties over time, controlling for changes in the mix of homes sold.

Source: FRED, St. Louis Fed. 431 monthly observations for Seattle.

Mortgage Rate

Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS), 30-year fixed rate — the most widely cited rate benchmark in the U.S. Weekly survey results averaged to monthly.

Source: FRED Series MORTGAGE30US

Household Income

Census Bureau Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE), King County median household income. Annual data interpolated to monthly — defensible because income doesn't jump monthly.

Source: FRED Series MHIWA53033A052NCEN

Down Payment

National Association of Realtors Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers, blended across first-time and repeat buyers weighted by market share. Not a flat assumption — actual buyer behavior data showing down payments ranged from 9.8% (2005, peak credit loosening) to 20.3% (2025, current tightening).

Source: NAR Annual Survey

Property Tax & Insurance

Market-specific rates. Seattle: 0.85% property tax (King County Assessor), 0.50% insurance (Washington state). These vary significantly by market — Dallas pays 3.07% combined versus San Francisco's 1.23%.

Source: Tax Foundation, Census ACS, Bankrate

PMI

MGIC industry-average tiers based on loan-to-value ratio. Ranges from 0.32% (85% LTV) to 1.25% (97% LTV). No PMI below 80% LTV.

Source: MGIC Rate Cards

The Calculation

The math is straightforward. For any month:

  1. Look up the Case-Shiller index → derive median home price
  2. Apply the blended down payment percentage → derive loan amount
  3. Calculate principal and interest using standard 30-year amortization at that month's rate
  4. Add monthly property tax, insurance, and PMI where applicable
  5. Divide total monthly PITI by monthly gross income
  6. That percentage is the SHAM value
Every step uses publicly available data. Every calculation is reproducible. If your number differs from mine by more than half a percentage point, something is wrong with one of the inputs, and I want to know about it.

The Affordability Channel: What 35 Years of Data Show

Over 431 monthly observations in Seattle — and validated across three additional markets — SHAM values for median buyers cluster within a consistent band.

SHAM RangeZoneWhat the Market Is Doing
Below 32%OpportunityHomes underpriced relative to income; appreciation pressure builds
32–40%HealthySustainable homeownership for median buyers
40–45%CautiousMarginal buyers exiting; buyer pool beginning to contract
45–52%StretchedSignificant stress; only higher-income buyers can compete
Above 52%StressedHistorically unsustainable; correction pressure building

This channel held through every cycle in the data: the S&L aftermath, dot-com, the 2003–2007 bubble, the crash, the recovery, COVID, and the 2022 rate shock.

Important Distinction

SHAM is not a debt-to-income ratio. When SHAM reads 52%, it doesn't mean buyers have 52% DTI. It means the median home is out of reach for the median household. The buyers still purchasing at that level have higher incomes. The families who can't compete are being priced out. SHAM measures stress on the market, not on individual loan files.

The Payment Illusion: Exotic Product Overlay

Here is the insight that 35 years of lending experience makes visible and that most affordability models miss entirely.

If buyers make decisions based on the monthly payment, then anything that lowers the payment changes the buyer's perception of what they can afford — even if it doesn't change the underlying economics. The SHAM Exotic Product Overlay measures the gap between what the housing market actually costs and what buyers were told it costs.

The Four Masks

Adjustable-Rate Mortgages (ARMs)

A buyer offered a 4.5% teaser rate instead of a 6.4% fixed rate qualifies for a significantly larger loan. ARM market share peaked at 34% of originations in 2004.

Source: FHFA Monthly Interest Rate Survey

Interest-Only Loans

Eliminating principal repayment for the first 5–10 years reduces the monthly payment by 20–25%. I-O market share peaked at 30% of originations in 2006.

Source: Inside Mortgage Finance

Negative Amortization / Option ARMs

Borrowers qualified at a 1.00% payment rate against a fully indexed rate of 6.15%. The payment didn't cover the interest — the loan balance grew every month. NegAm share peaked at 15% in 2006. California absorbed 60% of the $500B in Option ARMs originated during 2004–2006.

Source: Inside Mortgage Finance, Fitch Ratings, GAO

Temporary Buydowns

A more recent phenomenon. Builder or lender subsidies reduce the rate by ~1.7 percentage points during the initial period. When the buydown expires, the full payment arrives.

Source: Freddie Mac "Temporary Mortgage Rate Buydown Activity," 2023

The 2006 Gap: What Hidden Stress Looks Like

In 2006, core SHAM for Seattle — measuring what homes actually cost at standard 30-year fixed rates — read approximately 57%. Deep in the stressed zone.

But that's not what buyers experienced. The buyer using an Option ARM with a 1% payment rate experienced something closer to 45%. The perceived affordability was 12 percentage points lower than reality.

The Diagnostic Insight

High SHAM + high exotic product usage = masked stress. It explains why the bubble didn't feel like a bubble to the people inside it. Payments were manageable. Buyers were qualifying. Deals were closing — until the teaser rates expired, the I-O periods ended, the Option ARM recasts hit, and reality arrived.

Why This Matters Now

The exotic product landscape is far more subdued today. ARM share is low. Interest-only and negative amortization products are essentially extinct for conforming loans. Today's SHAM reading is largely unmasked. When SHAM shows 48% in November 2025, that number represents what buyers are actually paying, not a subsidized version. Whether that's reassuring or concerning depends on your perspective, but buyers today are making decisions based on payments that reflect long-term reality — which was not the case in 2006.

Which Income Tells the True Story

In February 2026, the San Francisco Federal Reserve published research demonstrating that house prices track per capita income — not median household income — especially after 2000. (Louie, Mondragon, Najjar, Wieland, "Housing Affordability and Housing Demand," FRBSF Economic Letter 2026-03.)

SHAM had independently observed the same dynamic and incorporates a dual-income toggle:

Median Household Income

"Can the typical family in our community afford to buy?"

Per Capita Income

"Can the people actually competing for homes afford what they're paying?"

By 2024, per capita income in King County exceeded median household income for the first time in our data. The gap between per capita SHAM and median SHAM narrowed from +21.70 percentage points in 1990 to near zero. Housing is now priced to what the buyer pool can afford, and the buyer pool is no longer representative of the typical household.

The Model Works Across Markets

SHAM was built for Seattle but validated across four markets to confirm its mechanics are universal.

MarketBuyer IncomeHome PriceProperty TaxInsuranceCombined TI
Detroit$90,000$245,0001.89%0.83%2.72%
Dallas$133,000$420,0001.75%1.32%3.07%
Seattle$166,000$850,0000.85%0.50%1.35%
San Francisco$240,000$1,350,0000.68%0.55%1.23%

Sources: HMDA loan records (1.69 million transactions), Tax Foundation/Census ACS 2023, Bankrate/Quadrant 2025.

Despite a 6.5x price range from Detroit to San Francisco, the same affordability mechanics operate in every market. We call this the Altitude Analogy — water boils at different temperatures at different elevations, but the physics are identical. Standard markets show ceilings around 50–55%. Elevated markets around 55–60%. Premium markets around 60–65%.

One additional discovery: buyers in Dallas ($133K income) and San Francisco ($240K income) end up with nearly identical residual income after housing and fixed costs — roughly $81,500. Despite earning $107,000 more, the SF buyer's additional income gets absorbed by higher taxes and higher housing. Economists call this Rosen-Roback spatial equilibrium. I call it observable reality.

What SHAM Cannot Do

  • SHAM measures affordability stress at the point of purchase. It does not track ongoing affordability for existing homeowners.
  • It does not predict prices, forecast crashes, or recommend buying or selling.
  • It does not account for individual circumstances — credit scores, savings, household composition, job stability — that determine whether a specific person should buy a specific home.
  • The 32–52% affordability channel is empirical, not theoretical. It describes what has been observed. It is not a guarantee about future behavior.
  • Down payment data is national (NAR), not Seattle-specific.
  • Income is interpolated from annual data.
  • Property tax and insurance rates are current estimates applied retroactively.

These are disclosed limitations, not hidden assumptions.

How to Verify Any SHAM Number

  1. Look up the Case-Shiller SEXRNSA index at fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SEXRNSA
  2. Multiply the index value by $2,299.50 to get estimated median home price
  3. Look up the Freddie Mac 30-year rate at fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US
  4. Look up King County median income at fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MHIWA53033A052NCEN
  5. Apply the NAR blended down payment for that year
  6. Calculate PITI using standard amortization, 0.85% property tax, 0.50% insurance, applicable PMI
  7. Divide monthly PITI by monthly gross income
The data is public. The math is arithmetic. The methodology is transparent. That is the point.

Explore SHAM Data

Interactive tools and monthly updates available at SeattleHousingFacts.com

Visit SeattleHousingFacts.com →
Barry Varshay

Barry Varshay

The Mortgage Mechanic | Creator of SHAM Housing Affordability Model

Licensed mortgage loan officer (NMLS #583050) with 35 years of industry experience, continuing education instructor for Washington state real estate professionals, and developer of SHAM.

© 2026 Barry Varshay. The Seattle Housing Affordability Model is an educational tool for housing market literacy. It is not financial advice or a lending recommendation. All data sources are publicly available and independently verifiable.